http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/25/nyregion/schools-eliminating-librarians-as-budgets-shrink.html
This is another news story based in America - New York this time - but this one shows how library services are being 'withdrawn' so to speak.
It's so sad to think of Librarians and Library Assistants losing their jobs in the school sector due to budget cuts. I understand that governments have to make savings somewhere, and in many cases I'm sure that they've exhausted other avenues of change first (and I would never want people to have to lose kindergarden classes - pre-school care is so important too!), only to come to the Library. I can't help than feel that this could cause so much damage in so many different ways:
- The obvious: no librarian = no proper library access, therefore detrimental to the school experience
- No use of Library in school = for many, probably no real access to learning library skills, as who knows how many of these children would be accessing a public library service?
- This one may be a little farfetched - cutting librarians = devaluing library services as a profession?
The way I see it is this: if you are looking to cut your budget, and you see the Library as somewhere to make a cut, you will lose professional skills. You may think that this service could be taken over by volunteers. In my mind, this is tantamount to saying that 'you do not need professional library services'. Therefore, you're devaluing the hard-earned and valued skills that some poor library professional has spent probably at least 3 years in gaining, as you're saying that 'anyone could do the job'. (Yes, I know I'm being rather general in scope here, but you get my point).
Volunteers are wonderful, and do a great job in many different areas of society. We couldn't get along without them! But to me, this just underlines the basic assumption that I know a lot of us have come up against: don't you just stamp books? How hard could it be? Which is why (being all political and serious - not usually me!) I don't agree with a lot of the whole 'Big Society' idea which the government is subscribing to just now. Volunteers have their much-appreciated place, but please remember that professional people do too: the need for the qualifications is there, or the courses wouldn't have been developed in the first place!
What does everyone else think? Let me know! (normal, not too serious service to resume shortly) :)